Law perversion: A review of Fredrick Bastiat’s essay, “The Law”


Bastiat enumerates why despite numerous legislations basic problems remain unsolved.

By Abdullah Tijani

First published in 1850, Federick Bastiat’s “The law” retains its relevance as if the publication was written for the 21st-century readers. The essay begins with what would be the main—and sufficient to say the only—problem the author was trying to address, and why it needs to be addressed.

“The Law perverted,” the French journalist and economist writes. To curtail evil acts, the government needs law, but what happened during Bastiat’s time shows the law perpetuating the very act it’s meant to curtail—evil.

The essay introduces the readers to exclusive terms that give clear pictures of the extent of law perversion. Fraternity is boldly distinguished from a union. While a union is understandable to be an organization of voluntary individuals who proposes no regulation to hurt neither its members nor other members of the public, fraternity is such an association that imposes alignment, proposes rules mar with compulsion, and gains wealth for its members at the expense of other members of the public.

Then we have “legal plunder.” Plunder is prohibited and often punished under the law, but law—legal plunder—shields some group of plunderers from prosecution. Few or no country is free from Bastiat’s legal plunder. In defining the term, Bastiat says, “see whether the law takes from some persons that which belong to them, to give to others that which does not belong to them.” The compulsory taxation system and government redistribution of wealth that reward idleness at the expense of the hardworking citizens is a clear example.

Unfortunately over the years, the social intervention programmes meant to help the poor have turned to woods fueling the fire of their menace. To wit, the result of false government philanthropy has made only the officials richer and the poor poorer.

The essay illuminates the readers with an understanding of what law, an instrument of force and coercion, could turn out to be. He states two ideas that cannot coexist to form a law. In essence, during legislation, justice and philanthropy cannot be merged to be the purpose of forming a law. Why? Because “the second part will destroy the first,” reveals Bastiat.

The critics of Bastiat’s works find their way to accept justice as the purpose of the law, but they couldn’t stop there. If the law could organize justice, they claimed, why shouldn’t it organize labor, instruction, and religion? Their claim, as honest as it sounds, ignores the fact that law is an instrument of force and coercion. Law organizing labor would mean forced labor, regulating instruction would mean forced instruction, and regulating religion would mean forced religion. How does that sound? The main deal, to Bastiat, is that it “could not organize labor, instruction, and religion without disorganizing justice.”

Perversion of law can be traced to the selfishness of the citizens who call on the government to “do something” even for a mere meager problem that could be better solved by civil societies. To some extent, private individuals often ask the government for legislation against the act of a neighbor he abhors, and big business tycoons know how to find their ways to influence government policies in their favor. This triggers the politicians in power to favor their cronies even when the poor citizens suffer.

The consequences of overregulation are explicit in the arbitrary use of lethal force against the citizens by the armed forces. A full-blown police state has become a popular trend not to fight crimes but commit them. Those saddled with the responsibility of saving lives are those who violently take it. New laws empower the government agencies over the citizens, and find justification therein for their exploitation. The truth, laws—over-legislation and police state—have resulted in nothing but destitution and death.

Like Bastiat’s days, contemporary legislations are perverted because they are more philanthropic than justice, and focus on satisfying the majority against the minority. Meanwhile, philanthropy is an element that can only attribute to a person acting voluntarily, not an abstract carrying a legal force. When asked what law should be, with no hesitation, Bastiat responded, “Law is a common force organized to prevent injustice; in short, law is justice.”

“The Law” is unique not only for its everlasting taste of time but also for anyone who wants to know why the world is full of corporate criminals despite government’s over-regulation, reading the essay would always seem as though written a night before.

This article was first published on Liberty International blog. Link to the original post here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *